The Water Model
Book a conversation

Published May 2026 · Last Reviewed May 2026

How this site works

I sell Enagic. Here’s exactly how that shapes what I write.

I earn money if you join Enagic. That should be the first thing you read on this page, not buried in a footer disclaimer. What follows is an explanation of how I try to make that conflict of interest irrelevant to what I publish.

When I started researching the Enagic business opportunity, I couldn’t find a single source I trusted completely. The distributor sites were too optimistic; they pitched outlier examples as the average or only spoke about money. Critic sites had their own agenda; most of them were playing the oldest trick in the book—funnelling readers toward a competing business model. I wanted the middle: someone who genuinely believed in what they were doing and would still tell me the hard parts. That’s what I’m trying to be here.

“The moment I’m more interested in your decision than in giving you a clear picture, this site stops being useful to either of us.”
— Aimee Devlin
Aimee Devlin researching and writing at her desk in San Miguel de Allende

What we publish and why

This site exists because honest information about the Enagic opportunity didn’t exist. Every article on The Water Model targets a specific question people are actually searching for. Questions like, “Is Enagic a pyramid scheme?” “How does the 8-point system work?” “What does the $466.30 median mean?” And answers it with the level of rigour you’d expect from a good health journalist. Named. Sourced. Honest about what the data says and where the limits of the evidence are.

The content is written for the person evaluating the opportunity, not the person already committed to it. If you’re looking for motivation, scripts, or income testimonials, this is the wrong site.

What I commit to on every article

  • Every number has a source. Income figures, commission calculations, regulatory dates—all linked to the primary document. Enagic's own earnings disclosure, the FTC's published actions, Enagic's compensation plan PDF. If I can't link to it, it doesn't go in.
  • The hard numbers come before the opportunity. The $466.30 median appears before any description of what's possible. Every article that could influence a financial decision presents the cost and what most people actually earn before it presents the best-case.
  • Primary sources only for regulatory claims. FTC notices linked directly to ftc.gov. DSSRC cases linked to truthinadvertising.org. BBB data linked to bbb.org. No citing a blog that cited a tweet.
  • Income figures from the disclosure, not from distributor testimonials. We do not use income screenshots as evidence of what's typical. The $466.30 median at 1A is in Enagic's own disclosure. That's the number that matters as a baseline.
  • We read the P&P. Both AU and US versions. References to policy are cited with section numbers. If a distributor tells you something contradicts the P&P, we can show you the section.
  • Platform reviews are disclosed. If we have a financial relationship with a platform we're reviewing, that fact is in the first paragraph.
  • My name and distributor ID are on every page. Not in the footer in small print—in the byline of every article. Aimee Devlin, Enagic distributor ID 1916898. The financial relationship is never buried.
  • Dates on everything, updates when things change. Every article shows when it was published and when it was last reviewed. Changes are logged publicly below.
DISCLOSED

The financial relationship—fully disclosed

Distributor ID1916898 (registered to Aimee Devlin)
Earns commission whenA reader becomes an Enagic distributor or purchases an Enagic product
Does not earn whenSomeone reads an article and decides not to join
Editorial controlAimee Devlin only. No article has ever been written, changed, or removed at Enagic's request
Enagic's ability to influence contentAs an active distributor, I operate under Enagic's Policies and Procedures. Content that violates those policies could result in action against my distributorship, so that's a real constraint. Within those boundaries, editorial decisions are mine alone. If Enagic ever requires a specific change to this site, I'll disclose it here.

The income we earn from Enagic referrals is real. It does not determine what we write. The $466.30 median income figure, the FTC notices, and the DSSRC case findings are published here precisely because a site that buried them would be useless to the people it’s supposed to serve.

What we don’t do

Some of this is principle. Some of it is just that it would make me uncomfortable to read back.

  • No income screenshots, lifestyle imagery, or "replace your 9-5" language. The earnings disclosure says the median 1A is $466.30. That's the frame, not an exception to footnote.
  • No income claims. This is the single issue behind every regulatory action Enagic's salesforce has faced—the FTC notice, DSSRC findings, and BBB complaint. We cite the published earnings disclosure instead.
  • No medical claims about Kangen Water beyond personal experience. Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has classified electrolysed alkaline water generators as medical devices since 1965, based specifically on gastrointestinal research, not broader therapeutic claims. That classification is real and worth understanding. It is also not a blank endorsement of everything said about the water. I write about what I noticed when managing symptoms of Hashimoto's. That's personal experience, not clinical evidence.
  • No countdown timers, urgency tactics, or limited-spots language. If the opportunity is right for you, it'll still be right after you've thought about it properly.
  • No anonymous content. Every article is written and signed by me. If I'm not comfortable putting my name on something, it doesn't go up.
  • We don't describe Enagic as "not an MLM". It is one, and the distinction matters.
  • We don't remove articles because a distributor or upline asks us to.

The sources we rely on

These are the primary documents cited across the site. All links go directly to the source, not to a summary of it.

Source
Detail
Enagic Earnings Disclosure Statement
Income data · Updated May 19, 2025 · Reflects 2024 distributor data
View source →
Enagic Distributor Compensation Plan
Commission structure · Updated June 2025
View source →
FTC MLM Income Disclosures Staff Report
Federal Trade Commission · September 4, 2024
View source →
TINA.org 100-MLM Earnings Investigation
Truth in Advertising · February 26, 2024
View source →
DSSRC Case #216-2025
Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · Closed May 2025
View source →

Update log

When something material changes—a comp plan update, regulatory action, training platform rebrand or reprice—affected articles are updated within 14 business days and logged here.

May 2026Income figures updated across all articles to reflect Enagic USA's May 19, 2025 earnings disclosure (2024 data). Previous figures referenced the 2020 disclosure ($440 median). Current figures: $466.30 median at 1A (49.90% of distributors). Full rank-by-rank breakdown added to income disclosure article.
May 2026Compensation plan figures updated to reflect Enagic's June 2025 PDF (previously referenced 2024 figures)
May 2026Added DSSRC Case #216-2025 to regulatory history article after decision published May 14, 2025

Income figures across this site reflect Enagic USA’s May 19, 2025 Earnings Disclosure Statement (2024 distributor data). The median 1A distributor earned $466.30 in 2024, before expenses. Full rank-by-rank breakdown available in the income disclosure article →

What to do if you think we’re wrong

If you find a factual error—a misquoted figure, a broken link, an outdated reference—email aimee@thewatermodel.com. Corrections are reviewed and published within 5 business days. If the correction changes the substance of an article, the update is logged publicly above.

Entity record

OrganisationThe Water Model
AuthorAimee Devlin
Distributor ID1916898
LocationSan Miguel de Allende, MX
Founded2026
AD—Aimee Devlin. If something on this site is wrong or out of date, I want to know. Tell me directly →